Barr contradicts key finding in IG report, saying FBI may have acted in ‘bad faith’ in opening 2016 Russia probe

National/World News
This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Attorney General William Barr on Tuesday discarded a key finding of the 435-page report released by the Justice Department’s watchdog, saying in an interview that the FBI may have acted in “bad faith” when they carried out an investigation into President Donald Trump’s campaign in 2016.

“I think our nation was turned on its head for three years, I think, based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by an irresponsible press, and I think that there were gross abuses of FISA and inexplicable behavior that isn’t tolerable in the FBI,” Barr told NBC News.

The Horowitz report released on Monday found that the FBI had properly opened its investigation, and the inspector general wrote that he found no evidence that bias influenced certain significant decisions made throughout the case.

Barr had remained largely quiet as the investigation by Inspector General Michael Horowitz wound toward a conclusion in recent weeks, but in the interview Tuesday he revealed deep mistrust of the premise of the Russia probe and indicated that the final word on FBI misconduct would not come until the investigation by John Durham, a veteran Justice Department prosecutor who he picked to lead the separate probe, was finished — perhaps as soon as in the late spring.

Barr excoriated the FBI for making mistakes and omissions as they sought to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page, in line with the findings of the Horowitz report.

But Barr took his criticism further, telling NBC that the FBI could have acted maliciously as they continued to seek out surveillance of the Trump campaign despite certain pieces of evidence that had been used to stand it up in court — like elements of the intelligence gathered by Christopher Steele — falling apart.

“They not only didn’t tell the court that what they had been relying on was completely rubbish, they actually started putting in things to bolster the Steele report,” Barr said. “That’s hard to explain. The core statement in my opinion by the IG is that these irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions were not satisfactorily explained. I think that leaves open the possibility to infer bad faith.”

“I think it’s premature now to reach a judgment on that but I think that further work has to be done and that’s what Durham is doing,” he continued.

The inspector general can only compel DOJ employees to cooperate with his investigation, and Barr described his protocols as “very deferential.”

“[Horowitz’s] approach is to say, if I get an explanation from the people I’m investigating that is not unreasonable on its face, then I will accept it as long as there’s not contradictory testimonial or documentary evidence… And all he said is people gave me an explanation. And I didn’t find anything to contradict it. So I don’t have a basis for saying that there was improper motive. But he hasn’t decided the issue of improper motive,” Barr said.

In an interview with ABC News on Monday, FBI Director Christopher Wray lamented “actions described in this report that [he] considered unacceptable and unrepresentative of who we are as an institution.”

But Wray added that he thought it was “important that the inspector general found that, in this particular instance, the investigation was opened with appropriate predication and authorization.”

Trademark and Copyright 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Popular

Latest News

More News