Judge: Slidell ordinance requiring permits for panhandlers is unconstitutional

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
New Orleans Panhandling Ordinance Ruled Unconstitutional

NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge has ruled that the City of Slidell’s panhandling is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment rights of people asking for money anywhere within the Slidell city limits.

According to the ACLU of Louisiana, under the ordinance, panhandlers would have been required to register with police and acquire a permit to engage in panhandling. The ACLU of Louisiana brought the suit on behalf of Gary Blitch, a U.S. Army veteran, and his co-plaintiffs David Knight and Daniel Snyder.

“This decision affirms that even unpopular speech is protected under the Constitution,” said Marjorie Esman, Executive Director of the ACLU of Louisiana. “The City of Slidell may not ban messages it doesn’t like or punish people for asking for help.  Instead it has an obligation to protect the rights of all people.”

In January 2017, the City agreed to suspend enforcement of the ordinance and passed a revised version with only minor changes. The final ordinance still required what the ACLU calls “a difficult and unnecessary process” for anyone who wished to exercise their right to ask others for money.

“The fundamental flaw in Slidell’s ordinance is that it required people to get permits from the government just to exercise their right to free speech in public,” said Staff Attorney Bruce Hamilton. “That’s offensive to the Constitution and to the values we hold as a free country.”

The plaintiffs were represented by ACLU of Louisiana Staff Attorney Bruce Hamilton, and cooperating attorney Ronald L. Wilson.