A federal judge has permanently blocked US President Donald Trump’s executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with US immigration authorities.
US District Court Judge William Orrick issued the ruling on Monday in lawsuits brought by two California counties, San Francisco and Santa Clara. Orrick said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress.
The ruling nullifies the executive order Trump signed in January, shortly after taking office, which was designed to crack down on so-called “sanctuary cities,” municipalities that do not comply with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requests for assistance with identifying and deporting undocumented immigrants.
Jurisdictions that have refused to comply include the cities of Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
The order was designed to “strip federal grant money from the sanctuary states and cities that harbor illegal immigrants,” according to then-press secretary Sean Spicer. The executive order immediately prompted a court challenge, first by San Francisco and followed by other counties including Santa Clara.
Earlier challenges had brought cities in breach of the order a temporary reprieve.
Attorney: Ruling a victory for rule of law
Those fighting the executive order celebrated the decision Monday.
“This is a victory for the American people and the rule of law,” San Francisco city attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement. “This executive order was unconstitutional before the ink on it was even dry.
“We live in a democracy. No one is above the law, including the president.”
The statement added that he was “grateful that we’ve been able to protect billions of dollars that help some of the most vulnerable Americans.”
However, a Department of Justice spokesman said the court had “exceeded its authority” in its ruling, and vowed that the department would continue to follow Trump’s direction with regard to the January executive order.
“The District Court exceeded its authority today when it barred the President from instructing his cabinet members to enforce existing law,” spokesman Devin O’Malley said.
“The Justice Department will vindicate the President’s lawful authority to direct the executive branch.”
What is a sanctuary city?
The term “sanctuary city” is a broad term applied to jurisdictions that have policies in place designed to limit cooperation with or involvement in federal immigration enforcement actions.
Cities, counties and some states have a range of informal policies as well as actual laws that qualify as “sanctuary” positions.
Most of the policies center around not cooperating with federal law enforcement on immigration policies. Many of the largest cities in the country have forms of such policies.
In 2015, more than 200 state and local jurisdictions did not honor requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain individuals, ICE Director Sarah Saldaña testified before Congress, and a subset of that group refused to give access to their jails and prisons to ICE.
According to tracking by the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that advocates for restricting immigration and opposes sanctuary policies, roughly 300 sanctuary jurisdictions rejected more than 17,000 detention requests, between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015.
The idea for sanctuary cities appears to have sprung out of churches in the 1980s that provide sanctuary to Central Americans fleeing violence at home amid reluctance by the federal government to grant them refugee status.
They became popular in more diverse locales to counter what officials there saw as overzealous federal immigration policies, particularly against those arrested for minor, non-violent crimes.
“San Francisco is a sanctuary city and will not waiver in its commitment to protect the rights of all its residents,” San Francisco Mayor Edwin Lee said in January, upon announcing an expansion to a city fund to provide legal services to the immigrant community, documented or otherwise.
Chicago has set up a similar fund, as has Los Angeles.
“Chicago has in the past been a sanctuary city,” Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in November, according to the Sun-Times. “It always will be a sanctuary city.”
Case that sparked immigration debate
The murder trial of an undocumented immigrant has drawn national attention — in part because he had been deported from the United States five times.
Jose Ines Garcia Zarate’s trial for the shooting of Kate Steinle, on a San Francisco pier in July 2015, stirred the already heated debate over immigration.
The case became a rallying cry for Trump and GOP politicians, who have invoked Steinle’s name in decrying sanctuary cities and promoting the construction of a border wall.
Before the shooting, officials in San Francisco had released Garcia Zarate from custody instead of turning him over to immigration authorities.